AGMA 19FTM26 PDF

AGMA 19FTM26 PDF

Name:
AGMA 19FTM26 PDF

Published Date:
10/01/2019

Status:
[ Active ]

Description:

Sizing of Profile Modifications for Asymmetric Gears

Publisher:
American Gear Manufacturers Association

Document status:
Active

Format:
Electronic (PDF)

Delivery time:
10 minutes

Delivery time (for Russian version):
200 business days

SKU:

Choose Document Language:
$25.5
Need Help?

Today, the benefits of asymmetric gears are being extensively discussed. They have yet to be widely adopted, but investigations are ongoing as to whether gear reducers can be improved with such techniques. The geometric definition of asymmetric gears is shortly described. The strength calculation of such gears can be calculated according to ISO standards, but the method for the bending stress must be adapted. This permits the power capacity of asymmetric gears to be calculated and compared with symmetric gears. In specific cases, when using asymmetric gears, the power capacity of a gear pair can be increased by up to 30%.

The power capacity of a gear pair is critical, but the noise and vibration behavior is also highly relevant. With appropriate profile modifications, gears can be significantly improved. A modification of the gear profile will change the load distribution during a meshing cycle, therefore changing transmission errors, contact pressure and power losses. Additionally, with tip and/or root relief, the contact shock at the beginning and the end of the meshing can be removed, substantially reducing the vibration and noise of the gear mesh.

The layout of profile modifications must be verified by a loaded tooth contact analysis (LTCA), which permits the analysis of the contact during a meshing cycle step by step. LTCA can be performed based on a finite element method (FEM) or with semi-analytical method (usually based on the Weber-Banaschek approach [1]). To get an optimum solution for a profile modification, it is very convenient to use a parameter variation technique. For example, tip relief and tip modification length are varied to find the best solution. For such a task with some hundreds of variants to check, the calculation time for an LTCA analysis becomes an issue, therefore, the use of the Weber-Banaschek approach is preferred. This approach was recently adapted for asymmetric gears to allow for efficient analysis.

The selection process of a steel gear with asymmetric teeth is discussed in detail. With a well selected profile modification, the noise excitation and Hertzian pressure can be reduced. The behavior of the critical parameters was verified for different torque levels and for helix and profile errors due to manufacturing tolerances.


Edition : 19#
File Size : 1 file , 1.9 MB
Number of Pages : 17
Published : 10/01/2019

History


Related products

AGMA 21FTM12
Published Date: 10/01/2021
NVH Analysis of an Axle Drive with Bevel Gearset
$25.5
AGMA 22FTM07
Published Date: 10/01/2022
Finding the Right Task for Optical Gear Metrology
$25.5
AGMA 96FTM12
Published Date: 10/01/1996
Investigation of Globoidal Wormgear Drives
$14.1
AGMA 211.02-69
Published Date: 02/01/1969
Surface Durability (Pitting) of Helical and Herringbone Gear Teeth
$12

Best-Selling Products

SN/TS 3031:2016
Published Date: 11/15/2016
Energy performance of buildings - Calculation of energy needs and energy supply
SN/TS 3032:2024
Published Date: 07/05/2024
Energy performance of buildings - Calculation of heating, cooling and power demand
SN/TS 3079:2010
Published Date: 04/28/2010
Strength graded structural timber - Dimensions
SN/TS 3160:2017
Published Date: 10/01/2017
Module based doors, windows and recessing for locking systems
SN/TS 3183:2008
Published Date: 12/01/2008
Solid softwood panelling for interior use
SN/TS 3186:2008
Published Date: 12/01/2008
Solid softwood cladding for exterior use