AGMA 908-B89 PDF

AGMA 908-B89 PDF

Name:
AGMA 908-B89 PDF

Published Date:
04/01/1989

Status:
[ Active ]

Description:

Geometry Factors for Determining the Pitting Resistance and Bending Strength of Spur, Helical and Herringbone Gear Teeth

Publisher:
American Gear Manufacturers Association

Document status:
Active

Format:
Electronic (PDF)

Delivery time:
10 minutes

Delivery time (for Russian version):
200 business days

SKU:

Choose Document Language:
$39
Need Help?

The procedures in this Information Sheet describe the methods for determining Geometry Factors for Pitting Resistance, I, and Bending Strength, J. These values are then used in conjunction with the rating procedures described in AGMA 2001-B88, Fundamental Rating Factors and Calculation Methods for Involute Spur and Helical Gear Teeth, for evaluating various spur and helical gear designs produced using a generating process.

Pitting Resistance Geometry Factor, I

A mathematical procedure is described to determine the Geometry Factor, I, for internal and external gear sets of spur, conventional helical and low axial contact ratio, LACR, helical designs.

Bending Strength Geometry Factor, J

A mathematical procedure is described to determine the Geometry Factor, J, for external gear sets of spur, conventional helical and low axial contact ratio, LACR, helical design. The procedure is valid for generated root fillets, which are produced by both rack and pinion type tools.

Tables

Several tables of precalculated Geometry Factors, I and J, are provided for various combinations of gearsets and tooth forms.

Exceptions

The formulas of this Information Sheet are not valid when any of the following conditions exist:

1) Spur gears with transverse contact ratio less than one, mp < 1.0.

2) Spur or helical gears with transverse contact ratio equal to or greater than two, mp ≥ 2.0. Additional information on high transverse contact ratio gears is provided in Appendix F.

3) Interference exists between the tips of teeth and root fillets.

4) The teeth are pointed.

5) Backlash is zero.

6) Undercut exists in an area above the theoretical start of active profile. The effect of this undercut is to move the highest point of single tooth contact, negating the assumption of this calculation method. However, the reduction in tooth root thickness due to protuberance below the active profile is handled correctly by this method.

7) The root profiles are stepped or irregular. The J factor calculation uses the stress correction factors developed by Dolan and Broghamer [1]1. These factors may not be valid for root forms which are not smooth curves. For root profiles which are stepped or irregular, other stress correction factors may be more appropriate.

8) Where root fillets of the gear teeth are produced by a process other than generating.

9) The helix angle at the standard (reference) diameter2 is greater than 50 degrees. In addition to these exceptions, the following conditions are assumed:

a) The friction effect on the direction of force is neglected.

b) The fillet radius is assumed smooth (it is actually a series of scallops).

Bending Stress in Internal Gears

The Lewis method [2] is an accepted method for calculating the bending stress in external gears, but there has been much research [3] which shows that Lewis’ method is not appropriate for internal gears. The Lewis method models the gear tooth as a cantilever beam and is most accurate when applied to slender beams (external gear teeth with low pressure angles), and inaccurate for short, stubby beams (internal gear teeth which are wide at their base). Most industrial internal gears have thin rims, where if bending failure occurs, the fatigue crack runs radially through the rim rather than across the root of the tooth. Because of their thin rims, internal gears have ring-bending stresses which influence both the magnitude and the location of the maximum bending stress. Since the boundary conditions strongly influence the ring-bending stresses, the method by which the internal gear is constrained must be considered. Also, the time history of the bending stress at a particular point on the internal gear is important because the stresses alternate from tension to compression. Because the bending stresses in internal gears are influenced by so many variables, no simplified model for calculating the bending stress in internal gears can be offered at this time.

1 Numbers in brackets [ ] refer to the bibliography.

2 Refer to AGMA 112.05 for further discussion of standard (reference) diameters.


Edition : B89
File Size : 1 file , 8.1 MB
Number of Pages : 89
Published : 04/01/1989

History

AGMA 908-B89
Published Date: 04/01/1989
Geometry Factors for Determining the Pitting Resistance and Bending Strength of Spur, Helical and Herringbone Gear Teeth
$39
AGMA 908-B89
Published Date: 04/01/1989
Geometry Factors for Determining the Pitting Resistance and Bending Strength of Spur, Helical and Herringbone Gear Teeth
AGMA 908-B89
Published Date: 04/01/1989
Geometry Factors for Determining the Pitting Resistance and Bending Strength of Spur, Helical and Herringbone Gear Teeth
AGMA 908-B89
Published Date: 04/01/1989
Geometry Factors for Determining the Pitting Resistance and Bending Strength of Spur, Helical and Herringbone Gear Teeth

Related products

AGMA 910-D12
Published Date: 03/15/2012
Formats for Fine-Pitch Gear Specification Data
$39
AGMA 12FTM07
Published Date: 10/01/2012
Validation of a Model of the NREL Gearbox Reliability Collaborative Wind Turbine Gearbox
$14.1
AGMA 11FTM24
Published Date: 10/01/2011
Induction Hardening of Gears with Superior Quality and Flexibility Using Simultaneous Dual Frequency (SDF)
$14.1
AGMA 08FTM13
Published Date: 10/01/2008
Hydrogen and Internal Residual Stress Gear Failures - Some Failure Analyses and Case Studies
$14.1

Best-Selling Products

SN-ISO/IEC TS 17021-11:2018
Published Date: 02/01/2019
Conformity assessment - Requirements for bodies providing audit and certification of management systems - Part 11: Competence requirements for auditing and certification of facility management (FM) management systems
SN-ISO/IEC TS 20000-5:2022
Published Date: 01/18/2022
Information technology - Service management - Part 5: Implementation guidance for ISO/IEC 20000-1
SN-ISO/IEC TS 22924:2021
Published Date: 06/22/2021
Identification cards - Transport layer topologies - Configuration for HCI/HCP interchange
SN-ISO/IEC TS 23078-3:2021
Published Date: 04/26/2021
Information technology - Specification of DRM technology for digital publications - Part 3: Device key-based protection
SN-ISO/IEC TS 27008:2019
Published Date: 02/01/2019
Information technology - Security techniques - Guidelines for the assessment of information security controls
SN-ISO/IEC TS 27100:2020
Published Date: 01/29/2021
Information technology — Cybersecurity — Overview and concepts