AWWA ACE99418 PDF

AWWA ACE99418 PDF

Name:
AWWA ACE99418 PDF

Published Date:
01/01/1999

Status:
Active

Description:

Application of Immersed Ultrafiltration Membranes for Color and TOC Removal

Publisher:
American Water Works Association

Document status:
Active

Format:
Electronic (PDF)

Delivery time:
10 minutes

Delivery time (for Russian version):
200 business days

SKU:

Choose Document Language:
$7.2
Need Help?
To prevent the formation of disinfection byproducts (DBPs), the US Environmental Protection Agency has introduced a two stage Disinfectants-Disinfection Byproduct rule (D/DBPR). Stage 1, finalized in November of 1998, established the maximum contaminant level for total trihalomethanes (TTHMs) and for five haloacetic acids (HAA5). Stage 2 follows, which is anticipated to set lower contaminant levels for TTHMs and HAA5, respectively. Enhanced coagulation has been identified as the best available technology for meeting the requirements of the D/DBP Stage 1 Rule for Total Organic Carbon (TOC) reduction and the removal of disinfection byproduct precursors. With enhanced coagulation, natural organic matter (NOM), color and TOC reduction is achieved using a higher coagulant dosage than would be utilized for turbidity removal. The pH of the raw water is also commonly optimized to maximize process efficiency. The application of immersed ultrafiltration membranes using enhanced coagulation has recently been developed and applied for disinfection byproduct precursor, color and TOC removal for drinking water applications. With this process, a single tank coagulation-ultrafiltration process replaces the coagulation-flocculation-sedimentation-filtration stages of a conventional treatment plant. Powdered activated carbon (PAC) can also be used in combination with enhanced coagulation, or alone to reduce disinfectant byproduct precursors by addition to the rapid mix stage upstream of the ultrafiltration membranes. Compared to conventional treatment, this method of water treatment results in higher color and TOC removal and requires less coagulant and PAC. The use of lower chemical dosage results in significantly less treatment residuals and reduced disposal costs. The system also has a small footprint since it is designed with a shorter hydraulic retention time as it is only necessary to form a floc that exceeds the membrane pore size.
File Size : 1 file , 270 KB
ISBN(s) : 1583210016
Note : This product is unavailable in Ukraine, Russia, Belarus
Number of Pages : 16
Published : 01/01/1999

History


Related products

AWWA ACE99311
Published Date: 01/01/1999
Residuals Management Challenges Facing Two Connecticut Water Utilities
$7.2
AWWA ACE99326
Published Date: 01/01/1999
Competition - Are You Ready and Willing?
$7.2
AWWA ACE99402
Published Date: 01/01/1999
Predictive Model and Factors Affecting NOM Rejection by, and Flux-Decline of, UF Membranes
$7.2
AWWA ACE99413
Published Date: 01/01/1999
San Francisco's Historic Water Supply Master Plan: 30 Water Utilities Cooperating on a Regional Scale
$7.2

Best-Selling Products

DOT 23 CFR PART 625
Published Date: 04/01/2020
DESIGN STANDARDS FOR HIGHWAYS
$9
DOT 23 CFR PART 645
Published Date: 04/01/2019
UTILITIES
$10.8
DOT 23 CFR PART 655
Published Date: 04/01/2018
TRAFFIC OPERATIONS
$9.3
DOT 33 CFR PART 127
Published Date: 07/01/2019
WATERFRONT FACILITIES HANDLING LIQUEFIED NATURAL GAS AND LIQUEFIED HAZARDOUS GAS
$11.7
DOT 33 CFR PART 154
Published Date: 07/01/2017
FACILITIES TRANSFERRING OIL OR HAZARDOUS MATERIAL IN BULK
$18.3
DOT 33 CFR PART 154
Published Date: 07/01/2019
FACILITIES TRANSFERRING OIL OR HAZARDOUS MATERIAL IN BULK
$18.3