AWWA MTC57594 PDF

AWWA MTC57594 PDF

Name:
AWWA MTC57594 PDF

Published Date:
03/05/2003

Status:
Active

Description:

Dual-Membrane Treatment for Brackish Water Supply at Sherman, Texas

Publisher:
American Water Works Association

Document status:
Active

Format:
Electronic (PDF)

Delivery time:
10 minutes

Delivery time (for Russian version):
200 business days

SKU:

Choose Document Language:
$7.2
Need Help?
The City of Sherman, Texas, currently operates a 10-million gallon per day (mgd) water treatment plant (WTP) to treat brackish water from Lake Texoma. The plant uses conventional treatment (flocculation/sedimentation/filtration) followed by electrodialysis reversal (EDR) to remove dissolved solids. As a result of upcoming regulations and growing water demands, the City of Sherman is expanding its Lake Texoma Surface WTP by 5 mgd of finished water capacity. Microfiltration/ultrafiltration (MF/UF) followed by reverse osmosis (RO) demineralization was selected as the best apparent technology to meet the City's operational and water quality goals. Treatment challenges include salinity reduction, turbidity control, total organic carbon (TOC) reduction, elimination of objectionable tastes and odors, and pathogen removal and/or inactivation from the surface water supply sources. Furthermore, the membrane-treated product water will be blended and must be compatible with water from the existing supply and treatment facilities. A pilot study was conducted to evaluate the ability of the planned treatment to meet the City's water quality objectives. As mentioned, planned treatment includes dual-membrane processes, MF/UF for suspended solids and pathogen removal, followed by RO for dissolved solids and TOC reduction. MF/UF pilots from three vendors (Ionics Norit X-flow, Pall Microza, and Zenon ZeeWeed) were followed by two Osmonics RO pilot units. The MF/UF vendors were required to recycle their backwash to achieve an overall system recovery of 99 percent. The product water from the MF/UF units was combined and fed to the two separate RO units so that the performance of membranes with varying characteristics could be compared. A scale inhibitor was used in both RO units. RO performance was compared to manufacturer's projections. Includes tables.
Edition : Vol. - No.
File Size : 1 file , 330 KB
Note : This product is unavailable in Ukraine, Russia, Belarus
Number of Pages : 18
Published : 03/05/2003

History


Related products

AWWA MTC57553
Published Date: 03/05/2003
Results and Assessment from Full-Scale Testing of Integrity Monitoring Methods for MF and UF Processes
$7.2
AWWA MTC57566
Published Date: 03/05/2003
Reducing Fouling and the Cost of Membrane Systems
$7.2
AWWA MTC57579
Published Date: 03/05/2003
A Model for Physico-Chemical Control of Gypsum Scale in Nanofiltration Membranes
$7.2
AWWA MTC57587
Published Date: 03/05/2003
Preparing for the Inevitable: A Survey of Membrane Cleaning Practices in the State of Florida
$7.2

Best-Selling Products

ASD-STAN prEN 2002-003
Published Date: 12/01/1975
Test methods for metallic materials - Part 3 : Load calibration of tensile testing machines
$2.616
ASD-STAN prEN 2002-006
Published Date: 01/31/2000
Metallic materials - Test methods - Part 6 : Bend testing
$25.179
ASD-STAN prEN 2002-017
Published Date: 05/31/1991
Test methods for metallic materials - Tube used under pressure - Part 17 : Integrity test
$2.616
ASD-STAN prEN 2002-018
Published Date: 05/31/1991
Test methods for metallic materials - Part 18 : Hydraulic distension test for tube
$5.232
ASD-STAN prEN 2002-020
Published Date: 02/29/1996
Test methods for metallic materials - Part 20: Eddy current testing of circular cross-section tubes
$22.563
ASD-STAN prEN 2002-021
Published Date: 01/31/2000
Metallic materials - Test methods - Part 21 : Radiographic testing of castings
$8.502