AWWA WQTC60699 PDF

AWWA WQTC60699 PDF

Name:
AWWA WQTC60699 PDF

Published Date:
11/15/2004

Status:
Active

Description:

Determination of TOCl, TOBr and TOI in Drinking Water by Pyrolysis and Off-line Ion Chromatography

Publisher:
American Water Works Association

Document status:
Active

Format:
Electronic (PDF)

Delivery time:
10 minutes

Delivery time (for Russian version):
200 business days

SKU:

Choose Document Language:
$7.2
Need Help?
A method to differentiate total organic chlorine (TOCl), total organic bromine (TOBr) and total organic iodine (TOI), which involves carbon adsorption, pyrolysis and ion chromatographic detection, has been developed by previous researchers and applied to the analysis of water samples. However, incomplete recoveries from model compounds and interference from auxiliary gas (CO<sub>2</sub>) were reported. The objective of this research was to determine the best TOX protocol for use with IC analysis. Two commercial analyzers (one using a pure O<sub>2</sub> carrier and one using O<sub>2</sub>/CO<sub>2</sub> mixture) and three commercially available activated carbons (two coconut based and one bituminous coal based) were selected for this research. Chlorine, bromine and iodine containing model compounds and chlorinated water samples with varying levels of bromide and iodide were tested on both analyzers and three activated carbons. Results showed that the pyrolytic analyzer using pure O<sub>2</sub> and off-line IC combined with a standard TOX carbon (coconut based) achieved the most complete recovery of TOCl, TOBr and TOI for both model compounds and real samples. There was no obvious difference between the two analyzers when used in microcoulometric detection mode. The O<sub>2</sub>/CO<sub>2</sub> pyrolytic system and off-line IC method showed incomplete recovery for some samples due to the condensation of halide ions and incomplete transfer line flushing. The use of CO<sub>2</sub> as an auxiliary gas resulted in interference in IC analysis, which made it necessary to purge dissolved CO<sub>2</sub> before IC analysis. The TOX method is moderately sensitive to nitrate rinse volume. The monohaloacetic acids were partly washed out during sample preparation. This problem was solved by modifying the nitrate rinsing solution. Complete recovery was achieved for all the selected compounds by this modified TOX protocol. Includes 13 references, tables, figures.
Edition : Vol. - No.
File Size : 1 file
Note : This product is unavailable in Ukraine, Russia, Belarus
Number of Pages : 20
Published : 11/15/2004

History


Related products

AWWA WQTC60577
Published Date: 11/15/2004
Results of the Big WET: An Epidemiology Study of the Microbiological Quality of Drinking Water in Davenport, Iowa
$7.2
AWWA WQTC60620
Published Date: 11/15/2004
The Effect of Water Quality Characteristics and RSSCT Design Parameters on TOC Breakthrough in GAC Columns
$7.2
AWWA WQTC60664
Published Date: 11/15/2004
Inhibition of CaCO3 Scale Deposition by Trace Concentrations of Some Common Ions
$7.2
AWWA WQTC60722
Published Date: 11/15/2004
Quantification of Pathogen Loads in the Wingecarribee Watershed: Verification of Pathogen Transport Rates at Field-Scale
$7.2

Best-Selling Products

CS UK CAS01
Published Date: 01/01/2003
The provision of holes in reinforced concrete beams
$7.5
CS UK CAS02
Published Date: 01/01/2014
Suspended concrete floors: maximum size of pour allowable and location of construction joints
$6
CS UK CAS03
Published Date: 02/01/2014
Straightening and rebending reinforcement on site
$6
CS UK CAS04
Published Date: 01/01/2014
Congested reinforcement: effects on placing and compacting concrete
$6
CS UK CAS05
Published Date: 04/01/2014
Holding down bolts in concrete: Suggested design procedures to BS 8110-1
$7.5
CS UK CAS06
Published Date: 01/01/2003
Reinforcement ripple
$7.5