AWWA WQTC60742 PDF

AWWA WQTC60742 PDF

Name:
AWWA WQTC60742 PDF

Published Date:
11/15/2004

Status:
Active

Description:

Evaluation of Non-Treatment Solutions for Compliance with Arsenic Rule: City of Peoria Arsenic Mitigation Study

Publisher:
American Water Works Association

Document status:
Active

Format:
Electronic (PDF)

Delivery time:
10 minutes

Delivery time (for Russian version):
200 business days

SKU:

Choose Document Language:
$7.2
Need Help?
The City of Peoria (City) delivers potable water to 100,000 of its residents using combination of its ground and surface water supplies. The City currently operates 29 wells to supplement its treated surface water supplies from two drinking water treatment plants (WTPs), the Greenway and Pyramid Peak. Most of the wells that the City operates have arsenic concentrations above detectable levels (>2 µg/L) while some of the wells exceed 10 µg/L level (Ahmed, 2003). The Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) for arsenic will be lowered from 50 to 10 µg/L on January 2006. Water utilities that use groundwater above the new MCL for arsenic will have significant challenges in complying with the upcoming regulation. The City completed a planning study and is currently implementing the recommendations of the study toward lowering the arsenic concentration for its potable water supply. They recently explored several non-treatment approaches towards minimizing the arsenic concentration. These options include: blending (i.e., blending low arsenic with high arsenic water), variable pumping rate (i.e., altering pumping strategies), and well rehabilitation (i.e., modification of well screening). Other options that are available include well head or centralized treatment. Treatment technologies are effective for removing arsenic (>95%) but are associated with high capital and operational costs. Moreover issues related to safe disposal of the arsenic laden sludge, spent adsorbents or membrane treated brine makes it even more difficult to implement treatment strategies. As a result, non-treatment strategies were being prioritized over treatment options as a first step toward meeting the upcoming regulation. This paper discusses some of the non-treatment options that were evaluated by the City. The findings of this study can also be used by other community and non-community water systems for implementing non-treatment as an alternative to arsenic compliance. Includes tables, figures.
Edition : Vol. - No.
File Size : 1 file
Note : This product is unavailable in Ukraine, Russia, Belarus
Number of Pages : 18
Published : 11/15/2004

History


Related products

AWWA WQTC60547
Published Date: 11/15/2004
Algae Metabolites in Arizona Surface Waters
$7.2
AWWA WQTC60550
Published Date: 11/15/2004
Breaking New Ground: Large Membrane Water Plants
$7.2
AWWA WQTC60567
Published Date: 11/15/2004
Monitoring Nitrification in Chloraminated Systems Using Molecular Detection Strategies
$7.2
AWWA WQTC60644
Published Date: 11/15/2004
Implementation of an Ethics Program in a Water Quality Laboratory
$7.2

Best-Selling Products

AIIM 10197
Published Date: 01/01/1993
Micrographics — Readers - Printers for transparent microforms — Characteristics
AIIM 10198
Published Date: 01/01/1994
Micrographics — Rotary camera for 16mm microfilm — Mechanical and optical characteristics
AIIM 21
Published Date: 01/01/2009
Standard Recommended Practice Markup Language – Part 1: Stratml Core
AIIM 6198
Published Date: 01/01/1993
Micrographics — Readers for transparent microforms — Performance characteristics
AIIM 7565
Published Date: 01/01/1993
Micrographics — Readers for transparent microforms — Measurement of characteristics
AIIM MS10
Published Date: 01/01/1987
Method for Determining Adhesion of Protection Sheet to Aperture Adhesive of Unitized Microfilm Carrier (Aperture Card)
$15.3