AWWA WQTC60742 PDF

AWWA WQTC60742 PDF

Name:
AWWA WQTC60742 PDF

Published Date:
11/15/2004

Status:
Active

Description:

Evaluation of Non-Treatment Solutions for Compliance with Arsenic Rule: City of Peoria Arsenic Mitigation Study

Publisher:
American Water Works Association

Document status:
Active

Format:
Electronic (PDF)

Delivery time:
10 minutes

Delivery time (for Russian version):
200 business days

SKU:

Choose Document Language:
$7.2
Need Help?
The City of Peoria (City) delivers potable water to 100,000 of its residents using combination of its ground and surface water supplies. The City currently operates 29 wells to supplement its treated surface water supplies from two drinking water treatment plants (WTPs), the Greenway and Pyramid Peak. Most of the wells that the City operates have arsenic concentrations above detectable levels (>2 µg/L) while some of the wells exceed 10 µg/L level (Ahmed, 2003). The Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) for arsenic will be lowered from 50 to 10 µg/L on January 2006. Water utilities that use groundwater above the new MCL for arsenic will have significant challenges in complying with the upcoming regulation. The City completed a planning study and is currently implementing the recommendations of the study toward lowering the arsenic concentration for its potable water supply. They recently explored several non-treatment approaches towards minimizing the arsenic concentration. These options include: blending (i.e., blending low arsenic with high arsenic water), variable pumping rate (i.e., altering pumping strategies), and well rehabilitation (i.e., modification of well screening). Other options that are available include well head or centralized treatment. Treatment technologies are effective for removing arsenic (>95%) but are associated with high capital and operational costs. Moreover issues related to safe disposal of the arsenic laden sludge, spent adsorbents or membrane treated brine makes it even more difficult to implement treatment strategies. As a result, non-treatment strategies were being prioritized over treatment options as a first step toward meeting the upcoming regulation. This paper discusses some of the non-treatment options that were evaluated by the City. The findings of this study can also be used by other community and non-community water systems for implementing non-treatment as an alternative to arsenic compliance. Includes tables, figures.
Edition : Vol. - No.
File Size : 1 file
Note : This product is unavailable in Ukraine, Russia, Belarus
Number of Pages : 18
Published : 11/15/2004

History


Related products

AWWA WQTC60547
Published Date: 11/15/2004
Algae Metabolites in Arizona Surface Waters
$7.2
AWWA WQTC60550
Published Date: 11/15/2004
Breaking New Ground: Large Membrane Water Plants
$7.2
AWWA WQTC60567
Published Date: 11/15/2004
Monitoring Nitrification in Chloraminated Systems Using Molecular Detection Strategies
$7.2
AWWA WQTC60644
Published Date: 11/15/2004
Implementation of an Ethics Program in a Water Quality Laboratory
$7.2

Best-Selling Products

1A1W1S1 Archive Product 105
Published Date: 01/01/2000
Welding Inspection Handbook
1A1W1S1 Archive Product 111
Published Date: 02/01/1981
Welding Technology for the Aerospace Industry
1A1W1S1 Archive Product 115
Published Date: 01/01/2002
Structural Welding Code - Steel
1A1W1S1 Archive Product 138
Published Date: 01/01/2002
Standard Welding Procedure Specification (Swps) for Gas Tungsten Arc Welding of Carbon Steel to Austenitic Stainless Steel (M-1, P-1 or S-1 to M-8, P-8, or S-8), 18 through 10 Gauge, in the As-Welded Condition, with or without Backing
1A1W1S1 Archive Product 142
Published Date: 01/01/2001
Ventilation Guide for Weld Fume
1A1W1S1 Archive Product 167
Published Date: 08/01/2008
Structural Welding Code Steel Bundled Set A