AWWA WQTC62457 PDF

AWWA WQTC62457 PDF

Name:
AWWA WQTC62457 PDF

Published Date:
11/01/2005

Status:
Active

Description:

Interlaboratory Validation of EPA Method 1103.1 (mTEC) for E. coli in Wastewater Effluent

Publisher:
American Water Works Association

Document status:
Active

Format:
Electronic (PDF)

Delivery time:
10 minutes

Delivery time (for Czech version):
200 business days

SKU:
awwa-wqtc62457_1264879

Choose Document Language:
7.20 €
Need Help?
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) recently conducted a validation study of Method 1103.1 (mTEC) for E. coli in wastewater effluent to characterize method performance across multiple laboratories and disinfected wastewater matrices and to develop quantitative quality control (QC) acceptance criteria. Ten volunteer participant laboratories, a verification laboratory, and two research laboratories participated in the study. Each laboratory spiked samples with laboratory-prepared and BioBall™ E. coli (ATCC 11775) spikes. Method 1103.1 mean laboratory-specific recoveries of E. coli from disinfected wastewater samples spiked with laboratory-prepared and BioBall™ spikes had an overall mean recovery of 75.8% and 57.8%, respectively. Laboratory-specific relative standard deviations (RSDs) from disinfected wastewater samples spiked with laboratory-prepared spikes ranged from 3.7% to 114.6%, with an overall pooled, within-laboratory RSD of 40.8%. Laboratory-specific relative standard deviations (RSDs) from disinfected wastewater samples spiked with BioBalls ranged from 0% to 34.6%, with an overall pooled, within-laboratory RSD of 15.4%. Method 1103.1 laboratory-specific false positive confirmation rates for unspiked disinfected/secondary results combined, ranged from 0% - 50%. Laboratory-specific false negative confirmation rates for unspiked disinfected/secondary results combined, ranged from 0% - 66.7%. Results from the interlaboratory validation studies of Method 1103.1 and Method 1603 were used to compare method performance based on recovery, precision, false positive and false negative confirmation rates. Method 1103.1 had significantly higher false positive and negative confirmation rates in comparison to Method 1603.
Edition : Vol. - No.
File Size : 1 file , 150 KB
Note : This product is unavailable in Ukraine, Russia, Belarus
Number of Pages : 4
Published : 11/01/2005

History


Related products

AWWA WQTC62420
Published Date: 11/01/2005
Use of Nanoscale Materials for Water Treatment to Achieve Multiple Water Quality Goals
7.20 €
AWWA WQTC62423
Published Date: 11/01/2005
High Efficiency Ion Exchange for Arsenic Removal
7.20 €
AWWA WQTC62439
Published Date: 11/01/2005
Laboratory Benchmark Study
7.20 €
AWWA WQTC62474
Published Date: 11/01/2005
Optimizing Coliform Monitoring Strategies
7.20 €

Best-Selling Products

ISO/FDIS 14644-12
Published Date: 07/01/2018
Cleanrooms and associated controlled environments -- Part 12: Specifications for monitoring air cleanliness by nanoscale particle concentration (Final Draft)
19.50 €
ISO/FDIS 14644-15
Published Date: 08/01/2017
Assessment of suitability for use of equipment and materials by airborn chemical concentration
46.80 €
ISO/FDIS 14644-16
Published Date: 03/04/2019
Cleanrooms and associated controlled environments - Part 16: Code of practice for improving energy efficiency in cleanrooms and clean air devices
ISO/FDIS 14644-17
Published Date: 2020
Cleanrooms and associated controlled environments - Part 17: Particle deposition rate applications
19.50 €
ISO/FDIS 14644-18
Published Date: 2023
Cleanrooms and associated controlled environments - Part 18: Assessment of suitability of consumables
19.50 €
ISO/FDIS 14644-3
Published Date: 04/26/2019
Test Methods