AWWA WQTC62457 PDF

AWWA WQTC62457 PDF

Name:
AWWA WQTC62457 PDF

Published Date:
11/01/2005

Status:
Active

Description:

Interlaboratory Validation of EPA Method 1103.1 (mTEC) for E. coli in Wastewater Effluent

Publisher:
American Water Works Association

Document status:
Active

Format:
Electronic (PDF)

Delivery time:
10 minutes

Delivery time (for Russian version):
200 business days

SKU:

Choose Document Language:
$7.2
Need Help?
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) recently conducted a validation study of Method 1103.1 (mTEC) for E. coli in wastewater effluent to characterize method performance across multiple laboratories and disinfected wastewater matrices and to develop quantitative quality control (QC) acceptance criteria. Ten volunteer participant laboratories, a verification laboratory, and two research laboratories participated in the study. Each laboratory spiked samples with laboratory-prepared and BioBall™ E. coli (ATCC 11775) spikes. Method 1103.1 mean laboratory-specific recoveries of E. coli from disinfected wastewater samples spiked with laboratory-prepared and BioBall™ spikes had an overall mean recovery of 75.8% and 57.8%, respectively. Laboratory-specific relative standard deviations (RSDs) from disinfected wastewater samples spiked with laboratory-prepared spikes ranged from 3.7% to 114.6%, with an overall pooled, within-laboratory RSD of 40.8%. Laboratory-specific relative standard deviations (RSDs) from disinfected wastewater samples spiked with BioBalls ranged from 0% to 34.6%, with an overall pooled, within-laboratory RSD of 15.4%. Method 1103.1 laboratory-specific false positive confirmation rates for unspiked disinfected/secondary results combined, ranged from 0% - 50%. Laboratory-specific false negative confirmation rates for unspiked disinfected/secondary results combined, ranged from 0% - 66.7%. Results from the interlaboratory validation studies of Method 1103.1 and Method 1603 were used to compare method performance based on recovery, precision, false positive and false negative confirmation rates. Method 1103.1 had significantly higher false positive and negative confirmation rates in comparison to Method 1603.
Edition : Vol. - No.
File Size : 1 file , 150 KB
Note : This product is unavailable in Ukraine, Russia, Belarus
Number of Pages : 4
Published : 11/01/2005

History


Related products

AWWA WQTC62420
Published Date: 11/01/2005
Use of Nanoscale Materials for Water Treatment to Achieve Multiple Water Quality Goals
$7.2
AWWA WQTC62423
Published Date: 11/01/2005
High Efficiency Ion Exchange for Arsenic Removal
$7.2
AWWA WQTC62439
Published Date: 11/01/2005
Laboratory Benchmark Study
$7.2
AWWA WQTC62474
Published Date: 11/01/2005
Optimizing Coliform Monitoring Strategies
$7.2

Best-Selling Products

17807 TR 068B
Published Date: 01/08/2020
BASEMENT MANUAL
$23.4
17807 TR 090 CD
Published Date: 01/01/2002
Annotated Design & Construction Details for CM
$34.8
17807 TR 090
Published Date: 01/01/2002
Annotated & Construction Details for CM Design
$48.6
17807 TR 090B
Published Date: 01/08/2020
Annotated Design and Construction Details for CM
$48.6
17807 TR 091
Published Date: 01/01/2003
Concrete Lintels for Concrete Masonry Structures
$14.1
17807 TR 104
Published Date: 01/01/1989
Building Radon Resistant Foundations
$3.6