AWWA WQTC62548 PDF

AWWA WQTC62548 PDF

Name:
AWWA WQTC62548 PDF

Published Date:
11/01/2005

Status:
Active

Description:

Treatment Strategies for Arsenic, Fluoride and Nitrate Removal - Minimizing Water Loss and Energy Consumption

Publisher:
American Water Works Association

Document status:
Active

Format:
Electronic (PDF)

Delivery time:
10 minutes

Delivery time (for Russian version):
200 business days

SKU:

Choose Document Language:
$7.2
Need Help?
In 1951, an Army Commander led a battalion of soldiers and decided to set-up his Fort in an area in the Southwest. The Commander chose this area since it was surrounded by three large lakes. Since then the Fort has been serving as a training center with a steady population of approximately 16,000 people. The Fort has been drawing water from the surrounding lakes for the past five decades. Over the past decade, the lakes went dry since the rate of pumping was greater than the rate of replenishment through rainfall. The Fort has no other sources of water, other than the groundwater from the dry lake basins. The groundwater at the Fort has elevated concentrations of arsenic (24-36 micrograms per liter (µg/L)), fluoride (6.4-7.5 milligrams per liter (mg/L)) and nitrate (4.3-5.7 mg-N/L). The Fort wants to reduce the levels of arsenic, fluoride and nitrate to less than 8 µg/L (80 percent of the new standard), 0.8 mg/L (State's guideline) and 5 mg-N/L (50 percent of the current standard), respectively. The authors assisted the Fort with the conceptual design of a new, centralized 6 mgd water treatment facility that would meet the Fort's current and future water needs. Several treatment and residuals handling alternatives were evaluated to keep the net water loss to less than three percent. The treatment alternatives that were evaluated consisted of activated alumina (AA) adsorption, anionic/cationic resin exchange, coagulation-assisted filtration, electrodialysis reversal (EDR) and reverse osmosis (RO). The residuals handling alternatives that were evaluated consisted of distillation, seawater RO and precipitation/mechanical dewatering. The various treatment and residuals handling alternatives were evaluated in terms of quantitative (e.g., costs, water loss, energy consumption) and qualitative (e.g., operational complexity, reliability, modularity) drivers. A scoring and ranking of the alternatives was performed using a multi-criteria decision program (Criterium Decision Plus). Based on this study, a phased approach of treatment and residuals handling to sustain the operation of the Fort for several years was recommended for implementation. Includes tables, figures.
Edition : Vol. - No.
File Size : 1 file , 660 KB
Note : This product is unavailable in Ukraine, Russia, Belarus
Number of Pages : 17
Published : 11/01/2005

History


Related products

AWWA WQTC62373
Published Date: 11/01/2005
Studying the Effectiveness and Stability of Orthophosphate on Washington DC's Lead Service Line Scales
$7.2
AWWA WQTC62375
Published Date: 11/01/2005
Performance of Large-Scale Biological Filtration for Removal of Particles and Biodegradable Organic Matter Produced by Ozonation
$7.2
AWWA WQTC62386
Published Date: 11/01/2005
Testing and Verification of Real-time Water Quality Monitoring Sensors in a Distribution System against Introduced Contamination
$7.2
AWWA WQTC62442
Published Date: 11/01/2005
A Framework for Filter Backwash Treatment
$7.2

Best-Selling Products

Basic Principles of Water Treatment
Published Date: 01/01/1996