ECIA EIA-772-A PDF

ECIA EIA-772-A PDF

Name:
ECIA EIA-772-A PDF

Published Date:
06/01/2008

Status:
[ Active ]

Description:

USER’S APPLICATION GUIDE TO FUSES

Publisher:
Electronic Components Industry Association

Document status:
Active

Format:
Electronic (PDF)

Delivery time:
10 minutes

Delivery time (for Russian version):
200 business days

SKU:

Choose Document Language:
$25.5
Need Help?

This guide has been prepared to aid the circuit and system designer in the selection of supplemental fuses. Traditionally, these have been fuses that interrupt the primary equipment power source when an overcurrent condition develops in a device or product. This guide will cover only fuses intended for electronic applications.

Introduction

Fuses that are covered in this Application Guide typically range in physical size up to 10.4 X 40 mm. These fuses fall within the ANCE-248 (Mexico)/CSA C22.2, 248 / UL 248, Supplemental Fuse Standard for North American applications. Current ratings covered by this Standard range from milliamperes to as high as 60 amperes, with voltage ratings up to 600 volts AC or DC. These devices are available in a variety of mounting schemes including plug-in, cartridge, through-hole and surface mount.

Fuses are quite complex despite their simple appearance. Each fuse type and current rating will have unique operating characteristics, maximum operating limits and internal construction. Subtle variations between manufacturers' designs will affect equivalency even between two seemingly identical devices. Further, any given type of fuse from a single manufacturer will have electrical and mechanical parameter variations that result from slight production variations during processing within a given lot and from lot to lot. Safety agency approvals, e.g., ANCE, CSA, and UL, are related to parameters for fuses employed in worst case applications. EIA will set minimum, non-safety related, requirements for fuses that will not serve to diminish minimum requirements set by the safety agencies. These will be comprised of additional requirements not associated with safety-related parameters. The goal of EIA is to standardize qualification performance and characteristics of equivalent fuses, manufactured by multiple sources in an effort to accommodate interchangeability.

Careful investigation by the design engineer must be carried out to determine what type of fuse is best for a given application. It may be beneficial to use both a fuse and some other device to provide more complete circuit or component protection.

Typically, an engineer designs a circuit to meet specified requirements. During the design phase it is important to consider circuit protection needs. The engineer should always assume that some type of circuit protection will be required. The fuse may ultimately be determined to be unnecessary, resulting in cost savings. However, the proper spacing will have been made available to safely accommodate the fuse, if it is required, and the product development can proceed on schedule within the initially budgeted costs.

Design parameter considerations to be addressed

• safety agency approvals;

• open circuit voltage;

• short circuit current potentially available (Interrupting current rating)

• steady state circuit current;

• space limitation;

• worst case current inrush or current spikes (peak current, time duration and multiple event time intervals must be anticipated);

• maximum permitted voltage drop across the fuse at the standard steady state circuit current;

• mounting method (clips, soldered leads, holders, surface mount, etc.);

• plating compatibility with clips, holders and solder;

• environmental issues: temperature, humidity, shock & vibration exposure (during production, during storage, during transportation and in field operation);

• I2t limitations;

• processing requirements (wave solder, IR reflow, aqueous detergent cleaning);

• open circuit indication (local and/or remote);

• RoHS compliance;

These are only a few of the preliminary considerations before beginning circuit design.

After a specific fuse is selected, the next step is to determine if the choice was the proper one. Fuses are somewhat unique in the realm of electronic components; if they function properly during stress testing, they are either weakened or made inoperable. Nondestructive test results, as well as tight production control, must be used to predict whether or not a given fuse will continue to perform as desired in a given application. This usually requires significant testing of a given fuse in the final product. Testing in the actual application is essential in many cases even though it is both a time consuming and costly part of the development process. A critical task, often left unfinished when any fuse is finally selected, is adhering to approved parameters. This should be done using a specification that sets limits on critical electrical and mechanical properties.

The Application Guide that follows will help in avoiding the pitfalls associated with erroneous fuse selection and sizing parameters. If problems should arise that have not been covered in this Application Guide, (fuseholder selection), the fuse manufacturers are available to assist in the selection and optimization process.


Edition : A
File Size : 0 files
Number of Pages : 18
Published : 06/01/2008

History

ECIA EIA-772-A
Published Date: 06/01/2008
USER’S APPLICATION GUIDE TO FUSES
$25.5
ECIA EIA-772
Published Date: 12/01/2001
User´s Application Guide to Fuses
$3.3
ECIA EIA/IS-772
Published Date: 08/01/1998
User´s Application Guide to Fuses
$2.1

Related products

ECIA EIA-364-69A
Published Date: 03/01/2002
TP-69A Low Level Induction Measurement for Electrical Contacts of Electrical Connectors
$24.3
ECIA EIA-977
Published Date: 02/01/2017
Test Method – Electronic Passive Components Exposure to Atmospheric Sulfur
$23.7
ECIA EIA-970
Published Date: 07/01/2013
Test Procedure for High Frequency Characterization of Low Inductance Multilayer Ceramic Chip Capacitors
$26.7
ECIA IS-43AJ
Published Date: 09/01/1988
Cable for LAN Twisted Pair Data Communications - Detail Specification for Type 9, Plenum Cable
$23.7

Best-Selling Products

SN-CEN/TS 1007-7:2006
Published Date: 09/27/2006
Advanced technical ceramics — Ceramic composites. Methods of test for reinforcements — Part 7: Determination of the distribution of tensile strength and of tensile strain to failure of filaments within a multifilament tow at high temperature
SN-CEN/TS 1046:2021
Published Date: 06/22/2021
Thermoplastics piping and ducting systems - Outside the building structures for gravity and pressurised systems - Trench installation
SN-CEN/TS 1071-10:2004
Published Date: 07/21/2004
Advanced technical ceramics — Methods of test for ceramic coatings — Part 10: Determination of coating thickness by cross sectioning
SN-CEN/TS 1071-11:2005
Published Date: 10/19/2005
Advanced technical ceramics — Methods of test for ceramic coatings — Part 11: Determination of internal stress by the Stoney formula
SN-CEN/TS 1071-8:2004
Published Date: 09/01/2004
Advanced technical ceramics — Methods of test for ceramic coatings — Part 8: Rockwell indentation test for evaluation of adhesion
SN-CEN/TS 1071-9:2004
Published Date: 02/11/2004
Advanced technical ceramics — Methods of test for ceramic coatings — Part 9: Determination of fracture strain