EUROCAE ED-238 PDF

EUROCAE ED-238 PDF

Name:
EUROCAE ED-238 PDF

Published Date:
04/01/2017

Status:
[ Withdrawn ]

Description:

OPERATIONAL SERVICES AND ENVIRONMENT DEFINITION (OSED) FOR TRAFFIC AWARENESS AND COLLISION AVOIDANCE (TAACAS) IN CLASS A, B AND C AIRSPACE FOR REMOTELY PILOTED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS (RPAS) OPERATING UNDER INSTRUMENT FLIGHT RULES

Publisher:
European Organization for Civil Aviation Equipment

Document status:
Active

Format:
Electronic (PDF)

Delivery time:
10 minutes

Delivery time (for Russian version):
200 business days

SKU:

Choose Document Language:
Need Help?
W/D S/S BY EUROCAE ED 313

SCOPE AND BACKGROUND

Today, manned aviation safety is ensured by application of regulations concerning materials, procedures and flight rules derived from.

One of the most fundamental capabilities is the “See and Avoid” capability. The pilot of an aircraft is required to be able to see other aircraft and avoid collision, whatever the airspace and environment he/she is flying through. For flight outside controlled airspace, visual acquisition may be the only means available to detect potential conflicting traffic, to achieve safe separation and to avoid collision.

This See and Avoid capability is expected to be replicated in RPAS where the pilot is remote.

ICAO RPAS Manual Doc 10019 [Ref 3] and ICAO Rules of the Air amendment 43 [Ref 2] define Detect and Avoid as, ‘the capability to see, sense or detect conflicting traffic or other hazards and take the appropriate action’, Depending on the type and location of the operations the RPA will conduct, Detect and Avoid would include the ability to:

1. recognize and understand aerodrome signs, markings and lighting;

2. recognize visual signals (e.g. interception);

3. identify and avoid terrain;

4. identify and avoid severe weather;

5. maintain applicable distance from cloud;

6. provide “visual” separation from other aircraft or vehicles; and

7. avoid collisions.

With such a wide range of differing requirements, it is likely that numerous different systems and sensors will be required to collect process and display information to the remote pilot and, where appropriate, automatically initiate RPA manoeuvres or other actions based upon the information received

NOTE: There are alternative definitions of Detect and Avoid in use outside of ICAO.

This OSED is addressing the collision avoidance capability, during en-route operation under Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) in Class A, B and C airspace. This capability is defined as Traffic Awareness And Collision Avoidance and includes

- The provision of traffic situation awareness information to the remote pilot

- The provision of collision avoidance manoeuvre guidance to the remote pilot in the event that a collision risk is detected

- The initiation of an automatic collision avoidance manoeuvre in the event that the remote pilot does not respond to a proposed collision avoidance manoeuvre (for whatever reason) in an appropriate time

- Full traffic awareness and collision avoidance operation, in situations when due to exceptional, circumstances, the Remotely Piloted Aircraft (RPA) is operating in airspace where non cooperative VFR traffic is present, however it does not provide specific guidance for ‘traffic avoidance’(rules of the air separation).

Self-separation and Traffic avoidance functions are out of scope as these are not allowed in Class A, B or C Airspace in which an aircraft may not manoeuvre without an ATC clearance except in an emergency (such as the need to avoid a collision) or to avoid hazardous weather.

The restriction to Class A, B and C arises because it is assumed that the RPA is receiving a separation service, which negates the need for a self-separation function. Apart from this restriction, the document describes a system potentially able to meet the requirements of certain classes of operations for the longer term. It is not intended that anything written here precludes the use of systems with more limited capability should such systems be approved by the appropriate regulators. The guidance in this document may apply to such systems provided it is interpreted appropriately in the light of their limitations. For example, a collision avoidance function with no ability to track non-cooperative traffic might prove acceptable in certain airspace environments.


Edition : 17#
Number of Pages : 47
Published : 04/01/2017

History


Related products

EUROCAE ED-261/3
Published Date: 11/01/2021
SAFETY & PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS STANDARD FOR A GENERIC SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM - GEN-SUR SPR VOLUME 3
$61.8
EUROCAE ED-227
Published Date: 09/01/2016
MINIMUM AVIATION SYSTEM PERFORMANCE STANDARDS (MASPS) AeroMACS
$113.4
EUROCAE ED-85A
Published Date: 12/01/2003
DATA-LINK APPLICATION SYSTEM DOCUMENT (DLASD) FOR THE "DEPARTURE CLEARANCE" DATA-LINK SERVICE
$29.4
EUROCAE ED-92C
Published Date: 09/01/2018
MINIMUM OPERATIONAL PERFORMANCE STANDARD FOR AN AIRBORNE VDL MODE-2 SYSTEM OPERATING IN THE FREQUENCY RANGE 118-136.975 MHz
$100.8

Best-Selling Products

PDI BPSGI
Published Date:
Basic Principles for Sizing Grease Interceptors
PDI G 101
Published Date: 03/01/2010
Testing and Rating Procedure for Hydro Mechanical Grease Interceptors with Appendix of Installation and Maintenance
PDI G 102
Published Date:
Testing and Certification for Grease Interceptors with FOG Sensing and Alarm Devices
PDI GGI-EM
Published Date: 01/01/2010
Guide To Grease Interceptors: Eliminating the Mystery
PDI MGO
Published Date:
Model Grease Ordinance
PDI MSREPFS
Published Date: 01/01/2009
MINIMUMSPACE REQUIREMENTS FOR ENCLOSED PLUMBING FIXTURE SUPPORTS