C02 -- Energy Benchmarking for Aerobic Wastewater Treatment Plants: Case Study in Lebanon PDF

C02 -- Energy Benchmarking for Aerobic Wastewater Treatment Plants: Case Study in Lebanon PDF

Name:
C02 -- Energy Benchmarking for Aerobic Wastewater Treatment Plants: Case Study in Lebanon PDF

Published Date:
2022

Status:
Active

Description:

Publisher:
ASHRAE

Document status:
Active

Format:
Electronic (PDF)

Delivery time:
10 minutes

Delivery time (for Russian version):
200 business days

SKU:

Choose Document Language:
$4.8
Need Help?
The end of the "low-cost energy" era has been written in solid bold font back in 1924 in London’s first energy congress. Thus, though disregarded in Lebanon, power management was a key factor for all energy-wheeled sectors, specifically wastewater treatment facilities, to optimize control strategies and operations. The definition of BM values as a monitoring tool for continuous improvement is the main aim of this paper. Considering energy BM is the most influential tool to optimize WWTPs energetic performance consequently reduce prime & operational costs and GHG emissions; this paper involves many key indicators for future improvement including data collection, data handling and sharing, data validation. WWTPs were benchmarked, incorporating preliminary, secondary (Aerobic Activated sludge), and tertiary treatment processes without sludge treatment. This paper summarizes the results of the first Lebanese WWTPs' energy BM. Data were collected from grouping of 96 WWTPs spread across all Lebanese territories based on: (a) treatment type, (b) designed & implemented size class, (c) weather, and (d) inhabitant population equivalent. The approach to energy BM selected for this study referenced methodology developed and applied for WWTPs worldwide and adopted the stepwise regression as statistical arithmetical method. The results indicated that specific energy demand varies in Lebanon WWTPs between 0.5kWh/m3 and 1.95kWh/m3 according to the most influential KPI's. Aeration consumed the highest energy consumption for all plants. No renewable energy, predominantly co-generation from biogas, or any other alternatives were used except diesel generators as an adjunct for EDL, Official Electrical Network Provider, shortfall. Simulation models are generated for the resulting energy benchmarks.
File Size : 1 file , 2.4 MB
Note : This product is unavailable in Russia, Belarus
Number of Pages : 17
Product Code(s) : D-ICEB22-C02
Published : 2022

History


Related products


Best-Selling Products

ISO/IEC 1001:2012
Published Date: 08/01/2012
Information technology - File structure and labelling of magnetic tapes for information interchange
$66.9
ISO/IEC 10021-1:2003
Published Date: 11/15/2003
Information technology - Message Handling Systems (MHS) - Part 1: System and service overview
$83.4
ISO/IEC 10021-10:1999
Published Date: 12/01/1999
Information technology -- Message Handling Systems (MHS): MHS routing -- Part 10:
$75
ISO/IEC 10021-2:2003
Published Date: 12/15/2003
Information technology - Message Handling Systems (MHS): Overall architecture
$83.4
ISO/IEC 10021-4:2003
Published Date: 12/15/2003
Information technology - Message Handling Systems (MHS): Message transfer system - Abstract service definition and procedures
$83.4
ISO/IEC 10021-5:1999
Published Date: 12/01/1999
Information technology -- Message Handling Systems (MHS): Message store: Abstract service definition -- Part 5:
$83.4