CH-03-07-4 -- Comparison Between Predicted Duct Effectiveness from Proposed ASHRAE Standard 152P and Measured Field Data for Residential Forced Air Cooling Systems PDF

CH-03-07-4 -- Comparison Between Predicted Duct Effectiveness from Proposed ASHRAE Standard 152P and Measured Field Data for Residential Forced Air Cooling Systems PDF

Name:
CH-03-07-4 -- Comparison Between Predicted Duct Effectiveness from Proposed ASHRAE Standard 152P and Measured Field Data for Residential Forced Air Cooling Systems PDF

Published Date:
2003

Status:
Active

Description:

Publisher:
ASHRAE

Document status:
Active

Format:
Electronic (PDF)

Delivery time:
10 minutes

Delivery time (for Russian version):
200 business days

SKU:

Choose Document Language:
$4.8
Need Help?

The proposed ASHRAE Standard 152P, “Method of Test for Determining the Design and Seasonal Efficiencies of Residential Thermal Distribution Systems ” (ASHRAE 2002), has recently completed its second public review. As part of the standard development process, this study compares the forced air distribution system ratings to measured field results. Fifty-eight field tests were performed on cooling systems in eleven homes in the summers of 1998 and 1999. Seven of these houses had standard attics with insulation on the attic floor and a well-vented attic space. The other four houses had unvented attics where the insulation is placed directly under the roof deck, and the attic space is not deliberately vented. Each house was tested under a range of summer weather conditions at each particular site and, in some cases, the amount of duct leakage was intentionally varied. The comparison between predicted efficiencies and the measured results includes evaluation of the effects of weather, duct location, thermal conditions, duct leakage, and system capacity. The results showed that the difference between measured results and those calculated using proposed Standard 152P is about 5 percentage points on average if weather data, duct leakage, and air handler flow are well known. However, the accuracy of the standard is strongly dependent on having good measurements of duct leakage and system airflow. Given that the uncertainty in the measured results is typically also about 5 percentage points, the Standard 152P results are acceptably close to the measured data.

Units: Dual


File Size : 1 file , 220 KB
Note : This product is unavailable in Russia, Belarus
Number of Pages : 10
Product Code(s) : D-16822
Published : 2003

History


Related products


Best-Selling Products

USP 01 DSI EC SafetyReview Protocol 2008-07-29
Published Date: 2009
USP Dietary Supplement Safety Review Process
USP 01 Manuf-Sale of Bulk Bot Exts Guidance
Published Date: 2009
Guidance for Manufacture & sale of bulk botanical extracts
USP 01 Marker Compound Guidance
Published Date: 2009
Use of Marker Compounds in Manufacturing and Labeling of Botanically Derived Dietary Supplements
USP 02 2008-04-03 DS GMPs
Published Date: 2009
Good manufacturing practices for dietary supps
USP 02 ASHWAGANDHA SAFETY REVIEW 2008-08-06
Published Date: 2009
USP Safety Review of Ashwaganda
USP 03 05 RetailLabeling
Published Date: 2009
Guidance for the retail labeling of dietary supplements containing soft or powdered botanical extracts