Variable air volume systems with hydronic reheat at terminal units are a common Heating Ventilation Air Conditioning (HVAC) system type in medium and large commercial buildings. This study measured HHW heat loss in detail in a 66,000 ft2 (6,200 m2) office and lab building, built in 2000, in Davis, California. We used methods adapted from Raftery et al. (Raftery, Geronazzo, et al. 2018) to calculate the HHW distribution losses from BAS measured data, and then measured unintentional heat loss at the whole building level including losses from distribution and passing HHW valves. We further measured HHW distribution losses in greater detail on a single HHW distribution branch removing loss contributions from other potential issues, such as passing HHW valves. For the whole building, using newly installed, calibrated water flow meter and matched pair calibrated RTD HHW supply and return temperature sensors, typical HHW setpoints, with all air handlers turned off, the steady-state unintentional heat loss was 4.4 W/m2 (1.4 Btu/h.ft2) when all VAV terminal unit HHW valves were commanded shut, and 3.2 W/m2 (1.0 Btu/h.ft2) when one HHW valve was commanded open. Focusing on one HHW branch, during normal building operation over a two-month period in the heating season, we used BAS readings for air flow rate, supply air temperature, and discharge air temperature and measured a distribution heat loss of 2.86 W/m2 (0.91 Btu/h.ft2) and 40% HHW distribution efficiency. Using separately installed, calibrated temperature sensors yielded a similar result (2.43 W/m2 (0.77 Btu/h.ft2), 49%), and further correcting air flow rates with passive flow hood single point calibration of BAS reported flow rates also yielded a similar result (2.76 W/m2 (0.87 Btu/h.ft2), 42%). The close agreement between the results using BAS and calibrated sensors suggest that existing buildings can be screened for heat loss reduction interventions using only BAS data. The magnitude of the measured HHW losses are small compared to design day loads, but they occur for a large number of hours so reducing these losses can save substantial energy. Further, during the cooling season the losses both waste heat and increase cooling loads. Paths forward include adopting aggressive heating hot water supply temperature resets, reducing unnecessary reheat operation, improving HHW pipe insulation practices, and/or changing design strategies to seasonal switchover or electrically driven distributed systems such as electric resistance or terminal unit heat pump equipment.
| File Size : | 1
file
, 4.4 MB |
| Note : | This product is unavailable in Russia, Belarus |
| Number of Pages : | 8 |
| Product Code(s) : | D-CH-24-C116 |
| Published : | 2024 |
