Effect of Geometry and Operational Parameters on the Dehumidification Performance of a Desiccant Coated Heat Exchanger PDF

Effect of Geometry and Operational Parameters on the Dehumidification Performance of a Desiccant Coated Heat Exchanger PDF

Name:
Effect of Geometry and Operational Parameters on the Dehumidification Performance of a Desiccant Coated Heat Exchanger PDF

Published Date:
2020

Status:
Active

Description:

Publisher:
ASHRAE

Document status:
Active

Format:
Electronic (PDF)

Delivery time:
10 minutes

Delivery time (for Russian version):
200 business days

SKU:

Choose Document Language:
$4.8
Need Help?
Solid desiccant dehumidification systems are an alternative to dehumidification systems through condensation. They use solid desiccant materials to adsorb the moisture in the process air for space cooling. There are two configurations of the solid desiccant dehumidification system: desiccant wheels and desiccant coated heat exchangers (DCHE). Previous studies focused on the effect on dehumidification performance using different desiccant materials on the DCHE. However, the performance of dehumidification remains to be quantified because the geometrical and operational conditions of the DCHE also play an essential role in its dehumidification performance for a given desiccant material. Therefore, it is important to evaluate their effects on dehumidification performance through modeling to assist in component design and operation. This paper provides the details of a one-dimensional heat and mass transfer model developed for this purpose. The model uses an implicit finite difference scheme to solve the governing equations, which represent the heat and mass balances in the control volume. The heat balances are evaluated for the airflow, water flow, tube, desiccant, and fin. The fin and solid desiccant are considered as having the same temperature. The mass balances are evaluated for the airside and the solid desiccant material. The outlet humidity results for dehumidification and regeneration showed a deviation lower than 15% from the experiment for most of the time. Still, the outlet temperature showed more difference, with results outside the 15% deviation range. The model temperature results also showed a faster change than the experiment. The model developed can be used to assist in the optimization of component design and operation for the best dehumidification performance.
File Size : 1 file , 3.2 MB
Note : This product is unavailable in Russia, Belarus
Number of Pages : 10
Product Code(s) : D-BSC20-C040
Published : 2020
Units of Measure : Dual

History


Related products


Best-Selling Products

JIS A 0005:1966
Published Date: 01/01/1966
Standard nominal size of opening components for buildings
$25.5
JIS A 0007:1967
Published Date: 01/01/1967
Standard nominal size of steel framed wall component for buildings
$14.1
JIS A 0008:1967
Published Date: 01/01/1967
Standard nominal size of steel framed roof component for buildings
$11.7
JIS A 0012:1980
Published Date: 01/01/1980
Modular co-ordination -- Sizes of sanitary unit for dwellings
$15.3
JIS A 0015:1976
Published Date: 01/01/1976
Modular co-ordinating sizes of piping unit for dwellings
$12.9
JIS A 0016:1979
Published Date: 01/01/1979
Modular coordination-coordinating size of opening for built-in appliances in storage furniture
$19.2