Evaluation of an Enthalpy Recovery Ventilator Installed in a Portable Classroom PDF

Evaluation of an Enthalpy Recovery Ventilator Installed in a Portable Classroom PDF

Name:
Evaluation of an Enthalpy Recovery Ventilator Installed in a Portable Classroom PDF

Published Date:
1998

Status:
Active

Description:

Publisher:
ASHRAE

Document status:
Active

Format:
Electronic (PDF)

Delivery time:
10 minutes

Delivery time (for Russian version):
200 business days

SKU:

Choose Document Language:
$4.8
Need Help?
A field study was conducted to evaluate the performance and cost-effectiveness of using an enthalpy recovery ventilator in combination with a conventional packaged air conditioner (AC) to meet the increased ventilation requirements of ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 62-1989 in Florida schools (Shirey et al. 1997). Two portable classrooms located in east central Florida were selected for testing.

With the packaged air conditioner alone, indoor humidity levels frequently exceeded 60% relative humidity (RH), even with outdoor ventilation at only 5 cfm (2.4 L/s) per person according to ASHRAE Standard 62-1981. The high humidity was caused by the single-speed compressor cycling on and off to maintain the indoor temperature while the supply fan operated continuously to provide ventilation air. Indoor humidity levels remained basically unchanged when an enthalpy recovery ventilator was installed and the outdoor ventilation rate was increased threefold in accordance with Standard 62-1989.

Energy recovery by the ventilator was partially offset by the added fan energy required for the intake and exhaust airflows. For example, cooling season tests indicated that the outdoor temperature must exceed the indoor temperature by at least 5°F (2.8°C) to offset the fan power and associated sensible cooling load attributed to the enthalpy ventilator. Due to the added fan energy and the temperate climate of Florida's east coast, the primary benefits provided by the enthalpy recovery ventilator were reduced capacity requirements and lower peak demand compared to a conventional air-conditioning system with the same ventilation rate (15 cfm or 7.1 L/s per person). An economic analysis indicated a simple payback period of around six years for this specific application, climate, and local energy costs.


Authors: Don B. Shirey, III

Citation: IAQ and Energy 98 Using ASHRAE Standards 62 and 90.1 Conference Papers

Keywords: October, Louisiana, 1998


File Size : 1 file , 350 KB
Note : This product is unavailable in Russia, Belarus
Product Code(s) : D-8128
Published : 1998

History


Related products


Best-Selling Products

CAN/CSA-ISO/TR 10013-01 (R2021)
Published Date: 12/01/2001
Guidelines for Quality Management System Documentation (Adopted ISO/TR 10013:2001, first edition, 2001-07-15)
$21.9
CAN/CSA-ISO/TR 10014-99 (R2004)
Published Date: 04/02/2000
Guidelines for Managing the Economics of Quality (Adopted Technical Report ISO/TR 10014:1998, first edition, 1999-08-01)
$14.1
CAN/CSA-ISO/TR 10017-00
Published Date: 04/01/2000
Guidance on Statistical Techniques for ISO 9001:1994 (Adopted Technical Report ISO/TR 10017:1999, first edition, 1999-09-01)
$21.9
CAN/CSA-ISO/TR 10017-03 (R2018)
Published Date: 11/01/2003
Guidance on Statistical Techniques for ISO 9001:2000 (Adopted ISO/TR 10017:2003, second edition, 2003-05-15)
$37.8
CAN/CSA-ISO/TR 13121:13 (R2021)
Published Date: 01/01/2013
Nanotechnologies - Nanomaterial risk evaulation (Adopted ISO/TR 13121:2011, first edition, 2011-05-15)
$50.1
CAN/CSA-ISO/TR 13154:14
Published Date: 10/01/2014
Breathing tubes intended for use with anaesthetic apparatus and ventilators (Adopted ISO 5367:2000, fourth edition, 2000-06-01)
$27.3