AWWA ACE56281 PDF

AWWA ACE56281 PDF

Name:
AWWA ACE56281 PDF

Published Date:
06/16/2002

Status:
Active

Description:

Microbial Removal and Integrity Monitoring of High-Pressure Membranes

Publisher:
American Water Works Association

Document status:
Active

Format:
Electronic (PDF)

Delivery time:
10 minutes

Delivery time (for Russian version):
200 business days

SKU:

Choose Document Language:
$7.2
Need Help?
The main objective of this research was to determine the integrity of reverse osmosis (RO) and nanofiltration (NF) membrane systems with respect to microbial passage using both microbial- and non-microbial surrogates. The focus of this paper is to present the results from pilot-scale tests. Pilot-scale experiments were conducted at two sites: Water Factory 21 (WF-21) at the Orange County Water District (OCWD) in Fountain Valley, Califormia and the Northwest River Water Treatment Plant (NWR-WTP) in the City of Chesapeake, Virginia. The source waters used were micro-filtered secondary effluent (MFSE) for the WF-21 tests, and conventional process-treated river water (CTRW) for the NWR-WTP tests. Waters from WF-21 and NWR-WTP were selected to reflect two generic types of source waters, i.e., surface waters and reclaimed wastewater effluent, for which disinfection or removal credit for pathogens by RO and NF would be most likely required. Two units were employed for testing in WF-21: a dual-element test unit (DETU) and a multi-stage test unit (MSTU). The DETU consisted of two pressure vessels arranged in series, operated in single-pass mode with no concentrate or permeate recycle to the feed. The ESPA1 RO element was operated in the lead vessel and the TFCS NF element in the trailing vessel. The test surrogates were injected into the feed line using an electromagnetic dosing pump. Pressure was measured in the feed and concentrate of each vessel using a single pressure gauge coupled to a 4-way selector valve. Permeate flow rate in each vessel and the final concentrate flow rate were measured using in-line flowmeters. Samples were collected from the feed (from an in-line sample port), the permeate from each vessel, and the final concentrate. The MSTU setup consisted of two separate flow streams in parallel each with two vessels in series (i.e. four lead vessels) followed by combined flow with a series of two vessels in series. Each vessel was designed to hold three spiral-wound elements. Permeate flows were regulated by a valve located in the final concentrate line. Permeate and concentrate flow rates were measured using in-line flowmeters. A single pressure gauge coupled to a four-way selector valve was used to measure the pressure difference between feed and concentrate at different locations (i.e., vessel 1&2, 3&4, 5, and 6). Samples were collected from the feed, final concentrate, individual vessel permeates and combined permeate through in-line sample ports. Includes 7 references, figures.
Edition : Vol. - No.
File Size : 1 file , 420 KB
Note : This product is unavailable in Ukraine, Russia, Belarus
Number of Pages : 14
Published : 06/16/2002

History


Related products

AWWA ACE56135
Published Date: 06/16/2002
Infrastructure Issues at Small (Air Force) Water Systems
$7.2
AWWA ACE56180
Published Date: 06/16/2002
Disinfection By-Product Analysis and Modeling in a Water Distribution System
$7.2
AWWA ACE56223
Published Date: 06/16/2002
Risk Analysis Application for Groundwater Injection Programs
$7.2
AWWA ACE56277
Published Date: 06/16/2002
Membrane Biofilm Reactors for Removal of Perchlorate
$7.2

Best-Selling Products