AWWA ACE61819 PDF

AWWA ACE61819 PDF

Name:
AWWA ACE61819 PDF

Published Date:
06/17/2005

Status:
Active

Description:

Using Nanoscale Materials in Water Treatment: Nanomaterials for Arsenic Removal

Publisher:
American Water Works Association

Document status:
Active

Format:
Electronic (PDF)

Delivery time:
10 minutes

Delivery time (for Russian version):
200 business days

SKU:

Choose Document Language:
$7.2
Need Help?
This study discusses the techniques for incorporating nanoscale materials in treatment systems (e.g., agglomerated media, embedded meshes, coated systems, etc). The second, main, part of the study focuses specifically on the use of nanomaterials for arsenic removal. Conclusions include comments about the risk of nanoparticles in drinking water. The new arsenic MCL means that water utilities have to install groundwater treatment at many wells that previously had simply chlorination, if any treatment. A current AwwaRF project is evaluating agglomerated nanoparticle media for arsenic removal. A wide range of metal, metal oxide, ceramic and organic nanoparticles (<5 nm to ~ 60 nm) are commercially available. The research was focused on two main objectives: screening different nanoparticles for use as arsenic adsorbents; and, investigation of commercially available agglomerated TiO2 nanoparticle media. One set of experiments evaluated arsenate removal using 15 different nanoparticles in ultrapure water and a GF/C filtered surface water adjusted to the same pH as the ultrapure water and both spiked with sodium arsenate (pH 7, ~900 ugAs/L, 3 day contact time, 1 g/L of nanoparticles). The surface water has a high TDS (~800 mg/L) and is representative of many groundwaters in the area, except that the surface water contains ~ 4 mg/L of DOC. Some nanoparticles (TungsO, La2O2) did not remove arsenate. Several other nanoparticles removed arsenate nearly equivalently in the laboratory and surface waters, while others had lower removal in the surface water probably due to competitive ion adsorption. The ZnO removed arsenate from 890 ug/L to <1 ug/L in laboratory water, but had significantly less effectiveness in the surface water. Some titanium based nanoparticles had better removal surface water than laboratory water. Based upon the results of the screening tests, isotherms experiments were conducted for 8 nanoparticles. This work demonstrates the viability of titanium and zirconium based nanoparticle-based treatment systems. Our team has conducted kinetic and equilibrium experiments, lab-scale rapid small scale column tests, and pilot-tests using one commercially available agglomerated TiO2 media (MetSorbG), often in parallel studies with other traditional adsorbents(E33,GFH). The agglomerated nanoparticle material appears to have better kinetic properties, resulting in potentially shorter required contact times in treatment systems. Adsorption capacities for TiO2 agglomerated media can be on the same order as traditional metal (hydr)oxide medias for arsenate, but appear higher for arsenite. Includes 15 references, figure.
Edition : Vol. - No.
File Size : 1 file , 510 KB
Note : This product is unavailable in Ukraine, Russia, Belarus
Number of Pages : 4
Published : 06/17/2005

History


Related products

AWWA ACE61599
Published Date: 06/17/2005
Degradation Dynamics of Microcystins by UV-microO3 Reactor
$7.2
AWWA ACE61681
Published Date: 06/17/2005
Impact of Enhanced Coagulation on the Removal of Total Organic Halide Precursors
$7.2
AWWA ACE61690
Published Date: 06/17/2005
Pre-Selection of UV Disinfection Equipment - Flexibility and Certainty At the Same Time
$7.2
AWWA ACE61754
Published Date: 06/17/2005
The Value of Reuse and Desal Water: Are They Worth the Cost?
$7.2

Best-Selling Products

TSSA LFHC-17
Published Date: 2017
TSSA Liquid Fuels Handling Code 2017