AWWA SOURCES59181 PDF

AWWA SOURCES59181 PDF

Name:
AWWA SOURCES59181 PDF

Published Date:
01/11/2004

Status:
Active

Description:

Water Conservation in Supermarkets

Publisher:
American Water Works Association

Document status:
Active

Format:
Electronic (PDF)

Delivery time:
10 minutes

Delivery time (for Russian version):
200 business days

SKU:

Choose Document Language:
$7.2
Need Help?
This paper addresses the question of how much water could be saved in urban supermarkets if a combination of advanced water treatment for the cooling systems and other in-store devices were used to conserve water. The study was conducted in Southern California under a grant from the California Department of Water Resources, and support from five water districts. Evaporative coolers are the single largest water use in most supermarkets, and this study focused on three water treatment systems that promised to allow the coolers to operate at higher cycles of concentration, thus reducing the amount of water needed for bleed. Theoretical calculations indicated that it might be possible to save approximately 490 kgal of water per year on average if the cycles of concentration were increased from their starting levels to a minimum of 6.0. In practice, the observed savings were somewhat larger than this, at approximately 700 kgal per year. Of the three processes studied, however, only the alkalinity control program succeeded in avoiding scale problems. The economics of the sites showed cost benefit ratios of converting to advanced treatment (like alkalinity control) justified the process, averaging 2.1 to 7.6. A certain amount of care is needed in monitoring the program, however, in order to avoid complications from phosphate and sulfate scales. Other water conservation measures for these stores included use of flow restrictors and high efficiency aerators for all sprayers washing faucets, elimination of garbage grinders, use of high pressure washers for floor and meat department washing and encouraging employees to notify management of leaks and water waste. The overall conclusion of the study was that with an aggressive program it should be possible to save up to 800 kgal, or 2.5 af, per store on average over the Southern California area. Includes tables, figure.
Edition : Vol. - No.
File Size : 1 file , 260 KB
Note : This product is unavailable in Ukraine, Russia, Belarus
Number of Pages : 9
Published : 01/11/2004

History


Related products

AWWA SOURCES59172
Published Date: 01/11/2004
TPDES Permit of Tomorrow: Integrated Permitting of San Antonio's Water Recycling Centers
$7.2
AWWA SOURCES59186
Published Date: 01/11/2004
Tragedy of Common Benefits: Implementing Regional Conservation Anyway
$7.2
AWWA SOURCES59187
Published Date: 01/11/2004
Replacement Toilet Flappers.....Are They Flushing at 1.6 Gallons?
$7.2
AWWA SOURCES59248
Published Date: 01/11/2004
Water Savings from a Turf Rebate Program in the Chihuahuan Desert
$7.2

Best-Selling Products

SCTE 01 1996R2001
Published Date: 01/01/1996
"F" Port (Female Outdoor) Physical Dimensions (formerly IPS SP 400)
$9
SCTE 01 2006
Published Date: 01/01/2006
"F" Port (Female Outdoor) Physical Dimensions (formerly IPS SP 400)
$7.5
SCTE 01 2021
Published Date: 2021
Specification for "F" Port, Female, Outdoor
$7.5
SCTE 02 2006
Published Date: 01/01/2006
Specification for "F" Port, Female, Indoor
$7.5
SCTE 02 2021
Published Date: 2021
Specification for "F" Port, Female, Indoor
$7.5
SCTE 03 2003
Published Date: 01/01/2003
Test Method for Coaxial Cable Structural Return Loss (formerly IPS TP 007)
$7.5