AWWA WQTC58844 PDF

AWWA WQTC58844 PDF

Name:
AWWA WQTC58844 PDF

Published Date:
11/02/2003

Status:
Active

Description:

Disinfection Byproduct (DBP) and Its Precursors Reduction by PAC, Alum, PAC1, and MIEX

Publisher:
American Water Works Association

Document status:
Active

Format:
Electronic (PDF)

Delivery time:
10 minutes

Delivery time (for Russian version):
200 business days

SKU:

Choose Document Language:
$7.2
Need Help?
Small drinking water systems using surface water sources will soon have to comply with the Stage I Disinfectants/Disinfection Byproducts (D/DBP1) Rule (January 1st, 2004). Small systems have the most difficulty meeting federal compliance standards for drinking water, because the treatment technology that may be affordable to large-scale operations may not be affordable for small-scale operations. Therefore, small system compliance problems are the most difficult problems to solve in the water industry. The overall objective of this research was to study the treatment of a variety of Missouri surface waters using techniques applicable to small systems such as powdered activated carbon (PAC), aluminum sulfate (alum), polyaluminum chloride (PACl), and anion exchange resin (MIEX) for removal of NOM and minimization of DBPs by single and sequential treatments. This study demonstrated that PAC treatment is unlikely to be a sole remedy to DBP problems because it cannot remove a sufficient amount of NOM at reasonable doses (30 mg/L). MIEX treated water had the highest ultraviolet absorbance (UVA) and Total trihalomethanes (TTHM) removal at 88 % and 86 %, respectively. For alum treatment, a minimum dose of 20 mg/L was required to destabilize the particles, causing a decline in UVA254. Lower pH improved alum and PACl performance. Sequential treatment clearly showed better UVA removal than single PAC or alum treatments. Sequential treatment for alum/PAC is at least 42 % to 47 % higher than PAC treatment alone and 6 % to 26 % higher than alum treatment alone, whereas sequential treatment for PACl/MIEX is at least 10 % to 26 % higher than PACl alone and 5 % to 33 % higher than MIEX alone. TTHM versus UVA and UFC chlorine dose (C24) correlation analysis showed that the UVA was better than C24 and dissolved organic carbon (DOC) for predicting TTHM for most waters. Includes 13 references, tables, figures.
Edition : Vol. - No.
File Size : 1 file , 410 KB
Note : This product is unavailable in Ukraine, Russia, Belarus
Number of Pages : 22
Published : 11/02/2003

History


Related products

AWWA WQTC58802
Published Date: 11/02/2003
Water Quality Monitoring in Response to Heightened Security
$7.2
AWWA WQTC58810
Published Date: 11/02/2003
Analysis of Halogen Substitution Patterns in DBPs Using ICR Data and Their Applications
$7.2
AWWA WQTC58825
Published Date: 11/02/2003
Use of Ozone and Filter Adsorbers to Remove DBP Precursors - City of Phoenix Study
$7.2
AWWA WQTC58897
Published Date: 11/02/2003
Addressing Multiple Water Quality Issues in Well Water Supply
$7.2

Best-Selling Products

SAA/SNZ HB 104:1997
Published Date: 01/01/1997
A guide to year 2000 compliance
$28.116
SAA/SNZ HB 76:2010
Published Date: 08/19/2010
Dangerous Goods - Initial Emergency Response Guide
$20.196
SAA/SNZ HB1:1994
Published Date: 10/17/1994
TECHNICAL DRAWING for students
$8.712
SAA/SNZ HB18.43.1:1998
Published Date: 09/05/1998
Guidelines for third-party certification and accreditation Guide 43 - Proficiency testing by interlaboratory comparisons, Part 1: Development and operation of proficiency testing schemes
$4.95
SAA/SNZ HB18.43.2:1998
Published Date: 09/05/1998
Guidelines for third-party certification and accreditation - Guide 43 - Proficiency testing by interlaboratory comparisons, Part 2: Selection and use of proficiency testing schemes by laboratory accreditation bodies
$2.376
SAA/SNZ HB18.58:1993
Published Date: 01/01/1993
Guideline for third-party certification and accreditation, Part 58: Calibration and testing laboratory accreditation systems - General requirements for operation and recognition
$2.376