AWWA WQTC58827 PDF

AWWA WQTC58827 PDF

Name:
AWWA WQTC58827 PDF

Published Date:
11/02/2003

Status:
Active

Description:

Critical Implementation Issues in Arsenic Sorptive Treatment: How to Prevent Good Technologies from Going Really Bad

Publisher:
American Water Works Association

Document status:
Active

Format:
Electronic (PDF)

Delivery time:
10 minutes

Delivery time (for Russian version):
200 business days

SKU:

Choose Document Language:
$7.2
Need Help?
Pilot testing of a granular ferric hydroxide (GFH) adsorption system was conducted using groundwater from Scottsdale, Arizona Well #4 to determine the ability of the media to remove arsenic (As) at various pH values. The media was able to treat only 3,200 BV of water at the ambient pH of 8.7 - 9.2 before effluent As concentrations exceeded the new maximum contaminant level (MCL) of 10 Au/L. However, when the pH was decreased to pH 7.5 to 6.0, the media treated 33,600 BV and greater than 65,000 BV before reaching the 10 Aug/L limit. Subsequent testing with GFH that had been used to treat pH-adjusted waters indicated that continuing treatment with this media without pH control would cause previously adsorbed As to come off the media into the effluent at concentrations much higher than the influent. In two tests at pH 6.0 and pH 7.5, As was found to desorb at levels three to four fold higher than the approximately 30 Ag/L As influent, which is also above the new MCL, and that the desorption process took 7 to 18 days. In other words, should pH control in a system stop for any reason, it would not be long before As levels in the effluent would be unacceptably high. Adjusting the pH of the water from Scottsdale Wells #23 and #32 required approximately 40 mg/L of carbon dioxide gas to decrease the pH from 8.3 to 7.0 and a dose of 110 mg/L to reduce the pH down to 6.3. An air-stripping test showed that an air/water ratio of 4 was adequate to remove sufficient CO<sub>2</sub> from a supersaturated water to increase a pH 6.3 water to above 8.0. These results indicate that pH adjustment can substantially increase the adsorption capacity of GFH, but that the greatest capacity occurs at a pH range where the potential for lead and copper corrosion issues is very high. Any lapse in pH control can cause some of the previously adsorbed As to enter the effluent and potentially cause a violation of the new MCL. Finally, the tests showed that the use of carbon dioxide gas addition followed by air stripping is a viable alternative to the use of acid/base addition for pH control for adsorption systems. Includes 6 references, tables, figures.
Edition : Vol. - No.
File Size : 1 file , 430 KB
Note : This product is unavailable in Ukraine, Russia, Belarus
Number of Pages : 18
Published : 11/02/2003

History


Related products

AWWA WQTC58789
Published Date: 11/02/2003
Water Quality Risk Assessment and Management - Implementation in Real Water Supplies
$7.2
AWWA WQTC58797
Published Date: 11/02/2003
Treatment and Non-Treatment Technology Planning for Arsenic Compliance - City of Peoria's Experiences
$7.2
AWWA WQTC58828
Published Date: 11/02/2003
Pilot Plant Testing of Dissolved Air Flotation for Algae and Arsenic Removal
$7.2
AWWA WQTC58852
Published Date: 11/02/2003
Application of the LT2ESWTR Microbial Toolbox
$7.2

Best-Selling Products

AIST/ISS DIR-20
Published Date: 01/01/2020
2020 Directory Iron and Steel Plants
$56.7
AIST/ISS PB-084
Published Date: 01/01/2002
Rolls for the Metalworking Industries
$52.5
AIST/ISS PB-099
Published Date: 01/01/2004
Continuous Casting, Volume 10: Tundish Operations
$29.4
AIST/ISS PB-126
Published Date: 01/01/2003
Austenite Formation and Decomposition
$42
AIST/ISS PB-127
Published Date: 01/01/2003
Modeling, Control, and Optimization in Ferrous and Non-Ferrous Industry
$51.9
AIST/ISS PB-210
Published Date: 01/01/2010
Bar Steels: Steel Products Manual
$31.5