AWWA WQTC58827 PDF

AWWA WQTC58827 PDF

Name:
AWWA WQTC58827 PDF

Published Date:
11/02/2003

Status:
Active

Description:

Critical Implementation Issues in Arsenic Sorptive Treatment: How to Prevent Good Technologies from Going Really Bad

Publisher:
American Water Works Association

Document status:
Active

Format:
Electronic (PDF)

Delivery time:
10 minutes

Delivery time (for Russian version):
200 business days

SKU:

Choose Document Language:
$7.2
Need Help?
Pilot testing of a granular ferric hydroxide (GFH) adsorption system was conducted using groundwater from Scottsdale, Arizona Well #4 to determine the ability of the media to remove arsenic (As) at various pH values. The media was able to treat only 3,200 BV of water at the ambient pH of 8.7 - 9.2 before effluent As concentrations exceeded the new maximum contaminant level (MCL) of 10 Au/L. However, when the pH was decreased to pH 7.5 to 6.0, the media treated 33,600 BV and greater than 65,000 BV before reaching the 10 Aug/L limit. Subsequent testing with GFH that had been used to treat pH-adjusted waters indicated that continuing treatment with this media without pH control would cause previously adsorbed As to come off the media into the effluent at concentrations much higher than the influent. In two tests at pH 6.0 and pH 7.5, As was found to desorb at levels three to four fold higher than the approximately 30 Ag/L As influent, which is also above the new MCL, and that the desorption process took 7 to 18 days. In other words, should pH control in a system stop for any reason, it would not be long before As levels in the effluent would be unacceptably high. Adjusting the pH of the water from Scottsdale Wells #23 and #32 required approximately 40 mg/L of carbon dioxide gas to decrease the pH from 8.3 to 7.0 and a dose of 110 mg/L to reduce the pH down to 6.3. An air-stripping test showed that an air/water ratio of 4 was adequate to remove sufficient CO<sub>2</sub> from a supersaturated water to increase a pH 6.3 water to above 8.0. These results indicate that pH adjustment can substantially increase the adsorption capacity of GFH, but that the greatest capacity occurs at a pH range where the potential for lead and copper corrosion issues is very high. Any lapse in pH control can cause some of the previously adsorbed As to enter the effluent and potentially cause a violation of the new MCL. Finally, the tests showed that the use of carbon dioxide gas addition followed by air stripping is a viable alternative to the use of acid/base addition for pH control for adsorption systems. Includes 6 references, tables, figures.
Edition : Vol. - No.
File Size : 1 file , 430 KB
Note : This product is unavailable in Ukraine, Russia, Belarus
Number of Pages : 18
Published : 11/02/2003

History


Related products

AWWA WQTC58789
Published Date: 11/02/2003
Water Quality Risk Assessment and Management - Implementation in Real Water Supplies
$7.2
AWWA WQTC58797
Published Date: 11/02/2003
Treatment and Non-Treatment Technology Planning for Arsenic Compliance - City of Peoria's Experiences
$7.2
AWWA WQTC58828
Published Date: 11/02/2003
Pilot Plant Testing of Dissolved Air Flotation for Algae and Arsenic Removal
$7.2
AWWA WQTC58852
Published Date: 11/02/2003
Application of the LT2ESWTR Microbial Toolbox
$7.2

Best-Selling Products

UNE-ISO/TR 10017:2004
Published Date: 06/25/2004
Guidance on statistical techniques for ISO 9001:2000
UNE-ISO/TR 12343:2010 IN
Published Date: 01/27/2010
Road vehicles -- Symbols for electrotechnical diagrams
UNE-ISO/TR 12885:2010 IN
Published Date: 11/24/2010
Nanotechnologies. Health and safety practices in occupational settings relevant to nanotechnologies
UNE-ISO/TR 14062:2007 IN
Published Date: 12/27/2007
Environmental management. Integrating environmental aspects into product design and development. (ISO/TR 14062:2002)
UNE-ISO/TR 15801:2008 IN
Published Date: 10/08/2008
Electronic imaging -- Information stored electronically -- Recommendations for trustworthiness and reliability
UNE-ISO/TR 15916:2007 IN
Published Date: 04/25/2007
Basic considerations for the safety of hydrogen systems. (ISO/TR 15916:2004)