AWWA WQTC62422 PDF

AWWA WQTC62422 PDF

Name:
AWWA WQTC62422 PDF

Published Date:
11/01/2005

Status:
Active

Description:

Optimizing Arsenic Removal in Peoria, Arizona, Surface Water Supplies for Blending High Arsenic Wells

Publisher:
American Water Works Association

Document status:
Active

Format:
Electronic (PDF)

Delivery time:
10 minutes

Delivery time (for Russian version):
200 business days

SKU:

Choose Document Language:
$7.2
Need Help?
This paper provides details on bench scale Arsenic removal testing performed at the City of Peoria, Arizona, Greenway Water Treatment Plant (Greenway WTP). The work described herein was conducted to assist the City of Peoria in meeting the new Arsenic maximum contaminant level (MCL) of 10 µg/L. By improving Arsenic removal at the Greenway WTP, the finished water was used to blend with high Arsenic well water. One solution that was used to lower Arsenic concentrations in water delivered to the drinking water distribution system was blending. In the development of a blending design, it was necessary to secure a dependable, low Arsenic source water with which to blend. One possible low Arsenic source for the City of Peoria was surface water supplied by Salt River Project (SRP). Peoria treats this water through the Greenway WTP located at the end of the Arizona Canal. If the Greenway WTP were to consistently deliver water with low Arsenic levels, the treated water could be used to blend down the concentration at some high Arsenic wells. SRP water primarily comes from the Salt River, Verde River, the Central Arizona Project (CAP) canal, and SRP groundwater wells that operate based on canal system needs. The percentage of flow contributed to the Arizona Canal from each source varies throughout the year and each surface water source can be the primary contributor to flow. Raw water Arsenic concentrations at the Greenway WTP vary significantly based on source water contributions. The Salt River and CAP Canal consistently had Arsenic concentrations less than 5-6 µg/L, but the Verde River water had Arsenic concentrations that varied from 8 µg/L to 18 µg/L. Significant contributions of Verde River water required improved Arsenic reduction in the Greenway WTP in order for blending to be feasible. Currently the Greenway WTP removes only 10 - 20% of the raw water Arsenic. City of Peoria Utilities Department engaged the services of Damon S. Williams Associates (DSWA) to provide options for dealing with the varying Arsenic levels from the multiple water sources and to provide options and recommendations for the treatment facility to meet future drinking water regulations at a cost effective price. In order to assess the possibility of improved Arsenic removal, a bench scale evaluation was performed. Testing was conducted on the three surface water sources that contribute flow to the Arizona canal: the Salt Rive; Verde River; and, CAP Canal. Two coagulants, Ferric Chloride (Ferric) and Aluminum Sulfate (Alum), were tested at a range of coagulant doses and under three pH conditions. The affect of ozone preoxidiation, which is currently employed at the Greenway WTP, was also tested. TOC removal was evaluated for all tests to ensure continued compliance with the Disinfection Byproducts Rule and associated Surface Water Treatment Rules. In general, testing results showed increasing Arsenic removal performance with increasing coagulant dose and decreasing pH. The bench scale testing showed that Ferric had markedly better Arsenic removal performance than Alum with the same equivalent metal dose. This trend appeared to be true regardless of the source water tested. It appears that with proper system design and operation, the Greenway WTP finished water can be used as a source for blending with high Arsenic well water. Includes tables, figures.
Edition : Vol. - No.
File Size : 1 file , 1.1 MB
Note : This product is unavailable in Ukraine, Russia, Belarus
Number of Pages : 18
Published : 11/01/2005

History


Related products

AWWA WQTC62407
Published Date: 11/01/2005
Mode of Occurrence, Treatment, and Monitoring Significance of Tetravalent Lead
$7.2
AWWA WQTC62416
Published Date: 11/01/2005
Profile of Manganese Breakthrough in Filter Effluent after Chlorine Loss
$7.2
AWWA WQTC62417
Published Date: 11/01/2005
Sequential Manganese Desorption-Adsorption in Anthracite Coal and Silica Sand Filter Media
$7.2
AWWA WQTC62418
Published Date: 11/01/2005
Characterization of Bromate-Reducing Microorganisms Isolated from Groundwater
$7.2

Best-Selling Products

SAA/SNZ HB 104:1997
Published Date: 01/01/1997
A guide to year 2000 compliance
$28.116
SAA/SNZ HB 76:2010
Published Date: 08/19/2010
Dangerous Goods - Initial Emergency Response Guide
$20.196
SAA/SNZ HB1:1994
Published Date: 10/17/1994
TECHNICAL DRAWING for students
$8.712
SAA/SNZ HB18.43.1:1998
Published Date: 09/05/1998
Guidelines for third-party certification and accreditation Guide 43 - Proficiency testing by interlaboratory comparisons, Part 1: Development and operation of proficiency testing schemes
$4.95
SAA/SNZ HB18.43.2:1998
Published Date: 09/05/1998
Guidelines for third-party certification and accreditation - Guide 43 - Proficiency testing by interlaboratory comparisons, Part 2: Selection and use of proficiency testing schemes by laboratory accreditation bodies
$2.376
SAA/SNZ HB18.58:1993
Published Date: 01/01/1993
Guideline for third-party certification and accreditation, Part 58: Calibration and testing laboratory accreditation systems - General requirements for operation and recognition
$2.376